CO129-234 - Acting Governor Cameron Governor Des Voeus - 1887 [9-12] — Page 293

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Ching Sam had nothing to do with the Twan house robbery,

14. Ng thi fun had made a full confession; it is not likely that he would have been let off with only a reprimand, and he did not; how is it that the Magistrate sent for him? I will allude to this point later on.

It is worthy of remark that no watchman except Chan Man should have gone after the robbers, when there was another watch house much nearer to the Kevan house than his.

He does not know where the Kevan house was, and he says he did not make any report about what happened on the night of the robbery.

He came to see me. I did not speak to the Justice. He said, "Were you wounded last night?" I said, "Yes." That was all that passed between us. He went to Jan Shek to be cured; while there, he did not make any report to any official. He returned to Yeung Ki on the 2nd May 1887. He did not make any official complaint when he came back.

From the depositions, it appears that the Magistrates or Justices had no evidence at all before them to connect the accused with the robbery of the Kwan's house. As far as I can see, they had made no enquiry, and the persons whom the Justices sent down to give evidence had not made any complaint or report, yet the Justices and Ma Ming at once sent for Kwan Sheep-i, Chan Man, and Ng thi-fun to come down and identify the accused.

Now, did they know that the accused had anything to do with the Kwan robbery, or that these witnesses knew anything of the case? The Justices seem to have framed the complaint and then looked for the witnesses.

157

290

9

Edit History

2026-05-25 20:24:40 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Ching Sam had nothing to do with the Twan house robbery, 14. Ng thi fun had made a full confession; it is not likely that he would have been let off with only a reprimand, and he did not; how is it that the Magistrate sent for him? I will allude to this point later on. It is worthy of remark that no watchman except Chan Man should have gone after the robbers, when there was another watch house much nearer to the Kevan house than his. He does not know where the Kevan house was, and he says he did not make any report about what happened on the night of the robbery. He came to see me. I did not speak to the Justice. He said, "Were you wounded last night?" I said, "Yes." That was all that passed between us. He went to Jan Shek to be cured; while there, he did not make any report to any official. He returned to Yeung Ki on the 2nd May 1887. He did not make any official complaint when he came back. From the depositions, it appears that the Magistrates or Justices had no evidence at all before them to connect the accused with the robbery of the Kwan's house. As far as I can see, they had made no enquiry, and the persons whom the Justices sent down to give evidence had not made any complaint or report, yet the Justices and Ma Ming at once sent for Kwan Sheep-i, Chan Man, and Ng thi-fun to come down and identify the accused. Now, did they know that the accused had anything to do with the Kwan robbery, or that these witnesses knew anything of the case? The Justices seem to have framed the complaint and then looked for the witnesses. 157 290 9
Baseline (Original)
Ching Sam had with the Twan anything to do at all house robbery, 14. of Ng thi fun had mase a full confession it is not likely that he would have been let off with only a reprimand and the did not, how is it that the Magistrate sent for him I I will allude to this point later on. It is worthy of remark 157 watchman except have remark that no Chan Man should gone after the robbers, when there was another watch house much to the Kevan house than his ArareA was He does not know where the 16. Kevan konse tvdo did not snake and he says he any report about what on the right of the robbery., came to see me. I did happened on the "The Justice "not speak to the Justice. He said were " you wounded last night. ? I said "Yes", "That was all that parsed between us." He went to Jan Shek to be cured; while while there he did not make one. any He returned to report to any Yeung Ki on the 2nd May 1887. He 290 did not make any official complaint when he came back. From the depositions it appears that the Magistrates of Justices had no evidence at all before them to connect the accused with the robbery of the Kwan's house. As far as I can they had made no enquiry and the persons whom the justices have sent = down to give had neade as soon as at evidence, rever ece any complaint or report, yet witnesses are wanted the Justices and Ma. Ming at once "Young Ki and Ma send and for Kwan Sheep-i, Chan Man? and tig tri-fun to come down and identify accused. Now did they know & that the accused had anything to do with. the Kwan robbery ? or that threse -witnesses knew anything of the. The Justices the case. 9 seem to have framed the have fromed Complaint and then looked for the witnesses
2026-05-25 20:24:40 · Baseline
View content

Ching Sam had with the Twan anything to do at all

house robbery,

14. of Ng thi fun had mase a full

confession it is not likely that he would have been let off with only a reprimand and the did not, how is it that the

Magistrate sent

for

him I I will

allude to this point later on.

It is worthy of remark

157

watchman except

have

remark that no

Chan Man should

gone after the robbers, when there was another watch house much

to the Kevan house than his

ArareA

was

He does not know where the

16. Kevan konse

tvdo

did not snake

and he

says he

any report about what

on the right of the robbery.,

came

to

see me.

I did

happened on the "The Justice "not speak to the Justice. He said were " you wounded last night. ? I said "Yes", "That was all that parsed between us." He went to Jan Shek to be cured;

while

while there he did not make

one.

any He returned to

report to any Yeung Ki on the 2nd

May 1887. He

290

did not make any official complaint when he came back. From the depositions it appears that the Magistrates of Justices had

no evidence at all before them to connect the accused with the robbery of the Kwan's house. As far as I can they had made no enquiry and the persons whom the justices have sent = down to give

had

neade

as soon as

at

evidence,

rever

ece

any complaint or report, yet witnesses are wanted the Justices and Ma. Ming at once

"Young Ki and Ma

send

and for Kwan Sheep-i, Chan Man? and tig tri-fun to come down and identify accused. Now did they know & that the accused had anything to do with. the Kwan robbery ? or that threse -witnesses knew anything of the. The Justices

the case.

9

seem to have framed the

have fromed

Complaint and then looked for the

witnesses

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.